One of the common concerns that fire departments have when it comes to mapping is “I collect all of this data in RMS, how do I map it?” This is a common concern with many fire departments, especially those that have little to no GIS resources and have the standard databases like FireRMS (Zoll Data Systems), FirePrograms, or FDM. Many of these come with mapping modules but it still may be a challenge to map information.
How do I map data?
There are several ways to map existing data. There is also ways to “model” data as well. We’ll go over both of those briefly
Map existing data
Mapping existing data relies on taking location data and mapping either actual or derived values from the data. Examples of location data include
- X and Y coordinates (Longitude and Latitude)
- Address
- Grid information (Map grids or some departments have Fire Demand Zone Grids)
You can map actual data for example the location of certain types of calls, the repeat location of calls, or response times for individual calls. You can derive data as well and this is common for mapping based upon a grid. For example you can take and calculate the average response time per grid. This can be created using Crystal Reports or MS Excel and then outputing to a table that is readable in a GIS application (DBF, XLS, CSV, MDB, Etc….).
To the right is an example of a grids used by a fire department. These grids were divided based on barriers like hills, freeways, railroads, and water bodies. Usually most fire departments will have smaller grids where there seems to be a high call volume density and larger grids where there isn’t a large call volume.
Modeling data
Another way to map data is to model data. There are two key benefits to modeling data.
- You can create scenarios (i.e. station placement) and examine the pros and cons, where as mapping existing data won’t directly tell you good placement if you haven’t run response from that location
- Creates information in areas where there isn’t a large call volume
- Most CAD systems that run “Live Routing” is an example of “modelling” calls.
Some disadvantages are
- Poor or inaccurate base data to run the modeling on
- Bases data may not include information that reflects things like steep hill, tight turns, speed bumps, or other things that impedes access
Examples
To the left is an example of mapping call locations bases on a longitude and latitude. This is a simple map that just shows unit and call locations. Below is the table that this was derived from.
|
Radio_Name |
Vehicle_ID |
Time_PreAs |
Time_Assig |
Time_Enrou |
Time_Arriv |
Time_Stage |
Time_Conta |
Time_Delay |
Time_Call_ |
PrimaryVeh |
AlarmLevel |
X |
Y |
|
A73 |
418 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.04268200000 |
47.57355700000 |
||||
|
M14 |
451 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
0 |
0 |
-122.04268200000 |
47.57355700000 |
||||
|
A83 |
397 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
0 |
0 |
-122.04268200000 |
47.57355700000 |
||||||
|
A71 |
386 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.03309700000 |
47.53005300000 |
||||
|
E81 |
408 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.06640100000 |
47.61149800000 |
||||
|
A72 |
389 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.05409200000 |
47.54913100000 |
||||
|
E71 |
377 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
7/1/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.03466300000 |
47.53688600000 |
||||
|
A88 |
401 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-121.76242100000 |
47.44306300000 |
||||||
|
E87 |
414 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
0 |
0 |
-121.76242100000 |
47.44306300000 |
||||
|
A71 |
386 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.04113300000 |
47.53011100000 |
||||
|
M14 |
451 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
0 |
0 |
-122.04113300000 |
47.53011100000 |
||||
|
E78 |
406 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.12265800000 |
47.49882500000 |
||||
|
E85 |
411 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-121.89684300000 |
47.64792800000 |
||||
|
A83 |
397 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.04268200000 |
47.57355700000 |
||||
|
M1 |
457 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
0 |
0 |
-122.04268200000 |
47.57355700000 |
|||||
|
E75 |
404 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.09900300000 |
47.56533900000 |
||||||
|
A72 |
389 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
0 |
0 |
-122.09900300000 |
47.56533900000 |
|||||
|
E73 |
417 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
0 |
0 |
-122.09900300000 |
47.56533900000 |
||||||
|
E71 |
377 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
0 |
0 |
-122.09900300000 |
47.56533900000 |
|||||
|
TR71 |
388 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
0 |
0 |
-122.09900300000 |
47.56533900000 |
|||||
|
A82 |
396 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.06121800000 |
47.62831900000 |
||||
|
M19 |
458 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
0 |
0 |
-122.06121800000 |
47.62831900000 |
||||
|
A71 |
386 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.04172700000 |
47.52071500000 |
|||
|
A81 |
395 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
1 |
0 |
-122.06480800000 |
47.62375500000 |
||||
|
82ST |
426 |
7/2/2005 |
7/2/2005 |
0 |
0 |
-122.06480800000 |
47.62375500000 |